SDP focuses on national politics with a special emphasis on South Dakota. It also includes posts on philosophy, science and culture. SDP was founded by Jason Van Beek, who stopped blogging after becoming a staffer for Sen. John Thune (R-SD) and is currently operated by Ken Blanchard.
So what do we have on tape. Crowley does not say Romney was right on the specifics of what he actually said. And, of course, we have Obama is on tape saying "these terrorist acts."
Now what Romney should have criticized the administration for was coming out with any information before an investigation was complete. However, had Carney and Rice not come out with information on what was being provided by intelligence, Romeny would have criticised that as a cover up The take home message is you can't trust Republicans to not lie about anything and everything.
Perhaps, Donald, Vice-President Biden should be told about Obama calling it a terror attack. That is not what Biden called it in his debate. And one wonders why President Obama kept talking about the attack being due to a video. President Obama does not want to admit the attack was due to AQ because he keeps telling us they are on the ropes. BTW, I went to the tapes. Obama was not talking about this particular event was a terror attack. That "these terrorists attacks" was about terrorism in general.
When it comes to lying, who does it the most? President Obama lies about the terror attack either in the beginning or in the cover-up. President Obama lies about how good the employment rate is. President Obama lies about his energy policies. President blames the high costs of gasoline and other energy on the great economy we have now. President Obama lies about the number of permits and amount of drilling in public lands. And to top it off, he takes credit for the increased drilling that is happening in spite of his policies rather than because of. He misleads us on pipelines. Romney wants the Keystone pipeline to become fact. Obama brags about the pipeline laid, but fails to mention we do not have that one from Canada. When the truth is seen, we see Obama's support crumble. Gallup now has it 51%-45%. I am cautiously optimistic that we will not have to endure another four years of this President's policies.
Why does the media have a leftist bias, when the leftists are the most likely ones to eventually do away with freedom of the media if they get the chance?
Candy might have put her thumb on the scale consciously, but if she did, it was her choice.
For now.
Take great care what you wish for, dear media colleagues. Someday you might get it.
This should be a non-starter for thinking GOPers. They run the risk of being viewed as craven, unpatriotic, political opportunists. Romney has already taken those lumps because of course, that's what he is. But there is hope for the rest of you. Stay out of that briar patch, boys, if you know what's good for ya. Just sayin'.
OK, Bill, now you are just making stuff up. The only people calling Romney craven, unpatriotic, political opportunists are the clowns on the left. The fact of the matter is it turned out he was right. We also now know the White House and specifically Obama has been lying about what actually happened. We also have found out despite repeated requests from Stevens, the State department refused to give the type of security that could have protected him and the three others murdered. The only political opportunists are the people in the WH who are hoping to run out the clock.
I did not see anybody calling him craven, unpatriotic or political opportunist. I thought we were talking about the lies the administration has been telling about Benghazi. Now the administration is trying to say Al Qaeda had nothing to do with it. They cannot because they are trying to convince the people that Al Qaeda is on the run. Keep drinking the Koolaid.
Thanks for posting.
Posted by: Bryce Rausch | Wednesday, October 17, 2012 at 08:09 AM
Detecting some bitterness amongst the losers this morning. The President brought a binder full of hammers.
Posted by: larry kurtz | Wednesday, October 17, 2012 at 09:07 AM
So what do we have on tape. Crowley does not say Romney was right on the specifics of what he actually said. And, of course, we have Obama is on tape saying "these terrorist acts."
Now what Romney should have criticized the administration for was coming out with any information before an investigation was complete. However, had Carney and Rice not come out with information on what was being provided by intelligence, Romeny would have criticised that as a cover up The take home message is you can't trust Republicans to not lie about anything and everything.
Posted by: Donald Pay | Wednesday, October 17, 2012 at 01:02 PM
Perhaps, Donald, Vice-President Biden should be told about Obama calling it a terror attack. That is not what Biden called it in his debate. And one wonders why President Obama kept talking about the attack being due to a video. President Obama does not want to admit the attack was due to AQ because he keeps telling us they are on the ropes. BTW, I went to the tapes. Obama was not talking about this particular event was a terror attack. That "these terrorists attacks" was about terrorism in general.
When it comes to lying, who does it the most? President Obama lies about the terror attack either in the beginning or in the cover-up. President Obama lies about how good the employment rate is. President Obama lies about his energy policies. President blames the high costs of gasoline and other energy on the great economy we have now. President Obama lies about the number of permits and amount of drilling in public lands. And to top it off, he takes credit for the increased drilling that is happening in spite of his policies rather than because of. He misleads us on pipelines. Romney wants the Keystone pipeline to become fact. Obama brags about the pipeline laid, but fails to mention we do not have that one from Canada. When the truth is seen, we see Obama's support crumble. Gallup now has it 51%-45%. I am cautiously optimistic that we will not have to endure another four years of this President's policies.
Posted by: duggersd | Wednesday, October 17, 2012 at 08:26 PM
Why does the media have a leftist bias, when the leftists are the most likely ones to eventually do away with freedom of the media if they get the chance?
Candy might have put her thumb on the scale consciously, but if she did, it was her choice.
For now.
Take great care what you wish for, dear media colleagues. Someday you might get it.
Posted by: Stan Gibilisco | Wednesday, October 17, 2012 at 08:54 PM
I can only hope to witness sometime, somewhere when the media can monitor debates without showing their personal preference in their questions .
Posted by: Nancy Black | Thursday, October 18, 2012 at 07:22 AM
This should be a non-starter for thinking GOPers. They run the risk of being viewed as craven, unpatriotic, political opportunists. Romney has already taken those lumps because of course, that's what he is. But there is hope for the rest of you. Stay out of that briar patch, boys, if you know what's good for ya. Just sayin'.
Posted by: Bill Fleming | Thursday, October 18, 2012 at 09:45 AM
OK, Bill, now you are just making stuff up. The only people calling Romney craven, unpatriotic, political opportunists are the clowns on the left. The fact of the matter is it turned out he was right. We also now know the White House and specifically Obama has been lying about what actually happened. We also have found out despite repeated requests from Stevens, the State department refused to give the type of security that could have protected him and the three others murdered. The only political opportunists are the people in the WH who are hoping to run out the clock.
Posted by: duggersd | Thursday, October 18, 2012 at 07:41 PM
Oh really? You must have Romnesia, Duggie.
http://dakotawarcollege.com/there-romney-goes-again/#comments
Posted by: Bill Fleming | Saturday, October 20, 2012 at 02:10 AM
I did not see anybody calling him craven, unpatriotic or political opportunist. I thought we were talking about the lies the administration has been telling about Benghazi. Now the administration is trying to say Al Qaeda had nothing to do with it. They cannot because they are trying to convince the people that Al Qaeda is on the run. Keep drinking the Koolaid.
Posted by: duggersd | Sunday, October 21, 2012 at 08:16 AM