« Chen4: The New Yorker Edition | Main | Fauxcahontas »

Friday, May 11, 2012


larry kurtz

Read 'em and weep, Doc: you earth hateres are finished.

larry kurtz

I've seen 2012 voting models where the President takes 47 states in a landslide and earth haters are thrown from Congress. Even Texas could go for Obama.

You bozos are so last century.

larry kurtz

Romney is serial bully who makes up history as he clutches and clambers for power:



Bill Fleming

My hunch is this will be settled at the SCOTUS level. Olson and Boies v California's Prop 8.
If the freedom to make a choice as to who one wants to marry isn't a fundamental human right, then what is it?

Stan Gibilisco

"At a certain point, I've just concluded that, for me personally, it is important for me to go ahead and affirm that I think same-sex couples should be able to get married," he [Barack Obama] said.

Why didn't he say "I now belive that same-sex couples should be able to get married"?

President Obama isn't the only politician guilty of this watering-down, thus dilution of force. Hillary Clinton is just as bad; so is Mitt Romney; so was George W. Bush. Ach, I guess that's why I love listening to Joe Biden. He calls a rose a hell of a flower, and spade a doggone dirt-diggin' tool.

Ken Blanchard

Stan: you are right. Everyone is all over the place.

Bill: There is no right to marry whomever one chooses. Should first cousins be allowed to marry? Probably not. But that is a judgment call to be made by legislatures. Can a man marry a woman who is sixteen years old? How about fourteen? These are judgment calls.

I doubt that the High Court will decide the matter. Short of some change in the balance, the Court will leave it up to the states, as it should.

Bill Fleming

I will argue that the right to choose is there and that the laws restrict it, KB. I don't believe laws bring human rights into existance. I believe the those rights come before the law, and can only be more or less secured by it.

Bill Fleming

A SCOTUS ruling would likely be that SSMs cannot be banned, thus overiding all the State bans. The States would then decide the semantics.

Stacey Hanrahan

Obama's evolution or devolution on this issue didn't change the political landscape. All it did however was excite Obama's base and coalesced Romney's. I agree that gay marriage should be best left to the states. A SCOTUS ruling on this issue would amount to judicial tyranny. Ironically enough, the states where gay marriage is legalized was decided by judicial fiat who had decided that the will of the American people was irrelevant.

Ken Blanchard

Bill: we both believe in natural rights, apparently. However, if the law does not bring rights into existence, it does bring marriage into existence. Even if there is a natural right to marry, you agree that the law can restrict it. The question then is whether this restriction is valid or not. There is nothing in the history of constitutional law that indicates a right to same sex marriage.

We would both vote to legalize same sex marriage. Our difference is that, like most people on the left, you want to write your every political preference into the rule book.


Let us not allow the health care syestm remain political alone.Health care plan can always be graded to suit the classes of people on its sensitivity. For example, categorization can stand for the rich, middle class and poor under a socialistic pattern that sounds relevant according to the purchasing power under the one payer syestm that is of the government besides exceptions of the extremely rich where they are not restricted on private coverings or where employees insurance cover is held by their employers with their independence on it of right or wrong.The point is, there must be an end to the ever emerging political debate on it that has money and its management at the back of it of self interest damaging the national image despite America of its past having one of the best health care syestms of covers according to many now in the process of being reviewed through reforms where government has come into the picture for it not with a sense of degrading but upgrading it through economic control on expenditure to tide over economic plans with drops of savings on all fronts seen by the economic experts rationally for a national purpose.I would therefore say it is not Obama’s plan, it is the plan of the executive of America that is seen by the President as such and if there are contrary signals to it they have to be supported by logic and logic on a plan that does not exist for its pros and cons on it, excuse my saying falls nothing short of dirty politics on it that America can ill afford of its world wide reputation?I am sure, the lady Michelle with perfect synchronization of her smile with the eyes searching political soul for her government blog would somewhat accept my view or else she can transcend that keeping me out of it because it is a domestic issue for America.I do not write for myself but I simply get grossly involved with the syestms that I would like readers of my communications to treat as my good weakness! - And nothing else.


A genuine Relationship Hello, I'm sehicarng for someone that is wanting more outside of life than just hanging out inside the bars and playing head video games. I have two great kids which wouldn't change anything about and meen everything to my opinion. I only get them every weekend and won't miss which usually for anything. If you continue reading then that is terr woman seeking man ific. I am not looking in a mother figure for them when they already have one. Just want someone to accept them. Now a smaller bout dating rich me; I'm x"lbs. not ugly by no meens although not a model either. LOL I have my own place in the united kingdom and truck. I enjoy doing anything outside. Like to make some of the most out of life. I'm looking for someone between the age of x-x please send a sales message and photo and I'll send one often if interested. Free sex ads Prosperity

The comments to this entry are closed.