« Chris Cillizza Nominates John Thune | Main | Was the Ft. Hood Shooter an Obama Advisor? »

Wednesday, November 18, 2009

Comments

Erik

KB: I'm with you on this one. I had an (ex) Brother-in-Law with some serious mental problems and it took the Marines, three years after he did several tours of duty in Iraq, to properly diagnose him. But after they did, he did get some very good care. One of the underdeveloped threads of the Hasan story is the carelessness of his superiors and the incompetence. I'm glad that it is getting the attention that it deserves.

NavyHelo

Thank you for the reference to a great article on Slate.

Radical Islam however, does not seem to be in danger of going away in the next few years.

What to do about the failure of Army leadership at Walter Reed; not the first time we heard of this, is it? As long as the American public demands simple solutions to complex problems, murderous fanatics like Hasan will slip through the cracks of Army leadership. The Army is disastrously short of senior enlisted and Majors/Captains. Depending on who you believe, 20-35% of those coming back from the wars suffer PTSD. And 10-20% of those serving there are on psychotropic drugs to manage their anxiety from combat. As tragic and clearly avoidable as the acts of this terrorist/murderer were, this is part of a larger problem.

How about searching for fewer knee-jerk answers and starting to properly focus our goals and resources in the War on Terror so we actually have the probability of increasing American security without such a high cost in destroyed lives among our troops. This will require the active engagement of the American Electorate to enforce proper resourcing of our soldiers and accountability for leadership in the Pentagon and their civilian bosses.

Remember the march to war in Iraq? Then-General Shinseki said it would take three times the number of troops to properly occupy conquered Iraq. Now he is in charge of the VA and trying to clean up the mess that was allowed to develop, not over months, but years while a distracted electorate had their sights set somewhere else.

dom youngross

The scandal behind the Fort Hood shootings is even deeper than you think.

If you recognize Nidal Malik Hasan as an Islamic terrorist, that's good for and on you.

If you also recognize President Obama traitorously doesn't want to call the Ft. Hood massacre an Islamic terrorist act, again, good for and on you.

And if you recognize a civilian trial of Khalid Sheihk Mohammed is duplicitous bash-Bush political hay-making grand-standing by President Obama, that's three in a row for you.

Now here's the BUT part:

But if at the same time you still support President Obama's bogus, self-serving, no-win Afghanistan war of Presidential Candidate Obama and Hamid Karzai's 2008 necessity, what difference does it make being right about the above three things?

It doesn't make a difference -- and it won't make a difference.

If you are in for an Iraq-drawdown/Afghanistan-buildup buck you get the bundle. That bundle includes Nidal Malik Hasan, Gen. Diversity Casey, President Obama, and SOS Clinton.

Worst of all that bundle includes our service personnel, who will bear the brunt of it all.

When you are doing something you shouldn't, in a place you shouldn't be, you just can't get good enough at doing it -- which includes 'resourcing' it.

Google Matthew Hoh to catch up with reality.

The comments to this entry are closed.