Good emails coming in, so let's respond to some.
Reader JR, in response to this post on the SDCAC and privacy, writes:
When you contemplate why conservatives may prefer to keep their contributions private please consider the case of Steve Kirby. The radical left more and more is resorting to threats and intimidation against anyone they can identify as an enemy.
True. And let's not pretend that such tactics are limited to the "radical left." This is why I mentioned the legitimate interest in keeping one's political activities private. In making that argument, frankly, I was stealing from Chief Justice Warren Burger's opinion in Buckley v. Valeo.
Reader Chris sends along this link defending ethanol from my critiques. Let me point out that I got almost the exact same thing as a pamphlet from the ethanol lobby at our country fair last year. Let me suggest that Chris's website is not exactly objective. I have linked to two independent studies showing a link between ethanol subsidies and rising food prices. But readers can investigate on their own and draw their own conclusions.
Reader Vic gave a substantive rebuttal to my Carrot Juice Is Murder post from yesterday. I'll respond to that in a separate post.
Recent Comments