This is the question posed by Mr. Powers. Does the site Dakota Women actually speak for the women of the Dakotas? He notices the preponderance of abortion/reproductive freedom talk at that site. Don't women care about more than these issues? He asks which issues qualify as "women's issues"?
As to whether the website Dakota Women actually speaks for the women of Dakota, I defer to K who rightly argues that, hey, you gotta choose a name, and Dakota Women is as good as any for a bunch of female bloggers from the Dakotas.
As to which issues are "women's issues" here is one of the rare moments when political science can actually help. In voting studies we look at the notion of "saliency," which issues are salient, i.e, particularly important, to particular groups. In this case we'd look at which issues are specially motivating for women and for men as women and men. It turns out abortion isn't one of them. As an issue, their position on abortion is not significantly related to how women or men vote. Those issues that are salient for women include social welfare spending, education, and the environment. For men it tends to be national defense and taxes. These differences indicate why, generally speaking, Democrats do better among women and Republicans do better among men. The issue of particular importance to the respective parties happen to match a divide between men and women regarding issue saliency.
I note that the discussion above deals only with men and women as voters. Of course we are not just voters and if we studied other behavior the results might be different.
Recent Comments