I had the pleasure of meeting Representative Herseth-Sandlin at the Northern State University spring commencement. We didn't have much time to talk, and we spent a lot of that talking about one of my students who went to High School with her. I found her very easy to like.
I didn't mention this in the conversation, but as someone interested in political strategy, I think it was a big mistake for her to change her public name. I have no objections to a woman taking her husband's name, or taking a hyphenated name if she chooses. In point of fact I rather like the Spanish tradition where everyone takes a double name. Thus from Mario Vargas Llosa, the name of my favorite Peruvian novelist, you can identify both his mother and his father's families.
But in American politics a hyphenated name is rather unwieldy, as evidenced by the fact that the Democratic front-runner has long since ceased calling herself Rodham-Clinton. In fact, to judge by her website, she has chosen to drop her last name altogether. At HillaryClinton.com she is referred to only as Hillary. I can't think of any male politician who does this.
Stephanie Herseth was a fine political name, and a politician's name is a brand name. It should roll off the tongue quite easily. Herseth-Sandlin is a lot more trouble to say, and it pushes the first name off the other end of the banner for most purposes. Would I like a transcript of the war room discussion when she informed her staff of this change. Though I notice that at Re-elect Stephanie Herseth Sandlin, she is almost always referred to as "Stephanie." Blanchard spots a trend!
Recent Comments