Case and Point

Responding to Ken Blanchard's post on Darwinism, here is Anna at the "Dakota Women" rebutting Ken by essentially putting her fingers in her ears and going "la la la la!!"  Sounds a lot like these people.  Anna, here are a couple examples.  Women have babies, men don't.  That's science, and I know other science is working hard to liberate women from the problem of having babies, but for now, it's still true.  And maybe public policy should account for that.  So if I go to a bar and order a drink no one cares.  But if an obviously pregnant woman goes to a bar and orders a drink, the bartender will refuse to serve her and the law will back up the bartender.  Maybe its unfair that only women have to deal with this potential issue, but that's just the way it is.  Also, men are more aggressive than women.  Perhaps public policy might want to account for that, and all the wishing in the world is not going to make that fact go away.  Just look at the prison population.  Also, our laws against rape pertain to men and women alike, but plainly they are in place to protect women against sexually aggressive men, not the other way around.  Perhaps the only differences between women and men have to do with their genitalia, but one would have to be seriously deficient in common sense to believe that.