On the issue of whether South Dakota should have moved up its presidential primary, see this report by The Hill, especially this line: "Allies of candidates who expect to do well in these states are taking lead roles in moving primaries there to early February. By holding primaries soon after the Iowa caucuses, the first contest of the year, such states will have a bigger impact than before on who becomes the Republican and Democratic presidential nominees." I'll admit I'm still of two minds on the issue, but holding an early primary would certainly give South Dakota a larger voice, which would be good for our state.
Recent Comments