Like my SDP colleagues, I fervently hope that Tim Johnson turns out to be fine. The last news on the net is that he did not suffer either a heart attack or a stroke, and that sounds encouraging. So does this summary from the New York Times:
WASHINGTON, Dec. 13 — Senator Tim Johnson,
a Democrat from South Dakota, was hospitalized today after what his
office at first called a “possible stroke,” leading to concern among Democrats that their new one-vote majority in the Senate could be in danger.
By the end of the day, after what his office called “a comprehensive evaluation by the stroke team” at George Washington University Hospital
here, a spokeswoman for Mr. Johnson said that he had not suffered a
stroke or a heart attack. The spokeswoman, Julianne Fisher, gave no
further details about Mr. Johnson’s medical condition.
His office said that Mr. Johnson, who will turn 60 on Dec. 28,
became disoriented during a conference call with reporters at midday.
He stuttered, then seemed to recover before asking if there were more
questions and then ending the call.
He walked back to his office, where he was examined by the Capitol
physician, who decided that Mr. Johnson should be seen at the hospital.
He was taken to the hospital by ambulance around noon.
That doesn't sound like a crisis; it sounds like reasonable caution. But it's not clear that any real news has been released for several hours.
I met Senator Johnson only once, when he came to campus and graciously agreed to speak to my American Government classes. On the personal level, I found it very easy to like him. Professionally, he was open and well-informed when he answered questions from my class.
The story is national news. The American News has the AP story. Every story I have seen, including this one from the Washington Post, has a comment on the political importance of the Senator's health.
The two-term senator's illness -- which sent Senate Democratic leader Harry M. Reid
(Nev.) rushing to the hospital to check on Johnson -- underscored the
fragility of Democrats' hold on the next Senate, which they won by the
narrowest of margins in the Nov. 7 elections. Should Johnson be unable
to complete his term, South Dakota's Republican governor, Michael
Rounds, would name a replacement for the next two years.
With
Johnson in office, Democrats would hold a 51-to-49 edge in the Senate
that convenes Jan. 4 as part of the 110th Congress. (The two
independents have said they will caucus with the Democrats.) But if he
is to leave office before then and Rounds replaces him with a
Republican, the GOP would control the chamber.
It would be unfair to blame the press for putting this forward. The precarious balance in the Senate is part of what makes this a national story. Nor do I think anyone should read too much into the first paragraph's note about Democratic Leader Harry Reid "rushing to the hospital." That may "underscore the
fragility of Democrats' hold on the next Senate," as the post puts it, but only because the Post is drawing lines under its own text. Reid is simply doing what a leader does. There is no reason not to point out the obvious implications of the story.
To wish Senator Johnson well just because of those implications would be as bad and wishing him ill for the same reason, only in the opposite direction. Todd Epp is right, that is not the kind of people we are here in the Rushmore State.
UPDATE: Powerline has this:
Senator Tim Johnson of South Dakota suffered a possible stroke during a phone call with reporters this afternoon, and was taken to George Washington University Hospital.
Should Johnson become disabled, Governor Mike Rounds of South
Dakota, a Republican, would name a replacement. If that replacement
were a Republican, the Republicans would retain control of the Senate.
Such speculation is highly premature, of course. It is likely that
Johnson will be fine. While a Democrat, my impression is that Johnson
is a pretty good guy. We wish him the best.
Via Power Line News.
To discuss this story, go here.
Recent Comments