I was interviewed today by the Rapid City Journal concerning Tom Daschle's chance of success should he choose to run for president. In sum, I said Daschle is running long odds, but the more I think about it that might be wrong. Here is my objective position as a political analyst, not my opinion as someone who is politically in opposition to Tom Daschle. I am willing to hear counter theories. Understand that what I said inthe interview (and what I say here) makes big assumptions about who is running on the Democratic side in 2008. I assume Hillary Clinton, John Kerry, Al Gore, Mark Warner, Russ Feingold, and Phil Bredesen are running. Here is what I essentially said to the RCJ.
1. I think Daschle would accept the VP spot if offered, but he can't say that because he wants to seem interested in the big job, not playing second banana. That's the smart move on his part. I do doubt he'd take a cabinet post if offered.
2. The contest is for the "un-Hillary" candidate, just in case Sen. Clinton stumbles. On the right you have Warner and Bredesen who can credibly claim that only a Southern moderate can win for the Democrats.
3. Daschle appears to be positioning himself to the left of Clinton. That area is a bit crowded, but each candidate has his flaws. Gore and Kerry, of course, had their shot and blew it (although Gore will argue he didn't really blow it, the Supreme Court did). Daschle, of course, lost his Senate seat. Feingold is a solid candidate from an electorally important state (Wisconsin), but he can't raise money the way Daschle can (Daschle should announce early before people like Warner and Clinton start sucking up the money). Kerry is the weakest of these candidates, but I can't decide which of the others is the strongest. I think Daschle has as good a claim as any.
4. I think Daschle has as good a shot as anyone at being
the left-wing alternative to Hillary Clinton. But Clinton is still the
strong favorite, and if she gets a serious challenge it will more
likely come from the right than the left. I think the Democratic Party
will have spent enough time in the wilderness that they will be
unwilling to take a chance on an ideologically pure candidate in favor
of an "electable" one.
Additional thoughts not in the interview:
5.Daschle can claim the martyr mantle. As Senate leader he fought George W. Bush and sacrificed his Senate seat for it. That appeals to many in the Democratic Party. And he was an effective leader, although his party lost seats under his watch in 2002 and 2004. Also, the governors here (Warner and Bredesen) will point out that he is "inside Washington" while they are outside.
6. If nominated Daschle is a good enough politician that he might get away with seamlessly moderating previous left-wing positions.
7. It is my position that if the Democrats nominate Warner or Bredesen, they waltz to victory. If they nominate anyone else we have a blood bath. This says more about the weakness of the potential Republican field than the strength of the Democrats.
I am not a Daschle supporter, but I have a lot of respect for him as a politician. I wouldn't sell him short (which is not a comment on Tom Daschle's height). Again, feel free to pass along comments.
Recent Comments