Having wandered onto the topic of the Clintons, the following from the New York Times is news fit to blog on. Ms. Clinton is generally regarded as the front runner for the 2008 Democratic nomination. I think she has done about as much to earn it as anyone ever does. I have admired Senator Clinton for the fact that, unlike other celebrity hopefuls like Jesse Jackson, she put her assets where her mouth was and won a senate seat as a platform to seek the Presidency. But there are signs, dare I say, that her judgment is not always sound.
She had only token opposition, but Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton still spent more on her re-election — upward of $30 million — than any other candidate for Senate this year. So where did all the money go?
It helped Mrs. Clinton win a margin of victory of more than 30 points. It helped her build a new set of campaign contributors. And it allowed her to begin assembling the nuts and bolts needed to run a presidential campaign.
But that was not all. Mrs. Clinton also bought more than $13,000 worth of flowers, mostly for fund-raising events and as thank-yous for donors. She laid out $27,000 for valet parking, paid as much as $800 in a single month in credit card interest and — above all — paid tens of thousands of dollars a month to an assortment of consultants and aides.
Throw in $17 million in advertising and fund-raising mailings, and what had been one of the most formidable war chests in politics was depleted to a level that leaves Mrs. Clinton with little financial advantage over her potential rivals for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination — and perhaps even trailing some of them.
Spending more money than any other candidate on a safe Senate seat, well, it does make one wonder. Apparently, this is all the buzz among Democratic circles.
Recent Comments