Randell Beck, executive editor of the Argus Leader, serves up another moronic column today, replete with guffaw-inducing passages like the following:
She [Randell Beck's wife] does not, to the best of my knowledge, maintain one of those Internet blogs from which she hurls venomous attacks on those who dare disagree with her view of the world.
Aww, c'mon Randell. We bloggers are obviously just trying to
spark debate. I thought that was a good thing. You know, First Amendment and all of that.
Randell Beck, of course, is pure as the driven snow when it comes to launching venomous attacks. Take the following comment he recently made on a local radio show, where, practically in the same breath, he decries name-calling and then calls people names:
That men and women can debate issues of great importance without getting down into the gutter, without calling each other names. And I really do think that represents the way we in South Dakota feel about debating the issues of the day. But there’s a small group of people—and you know, some of them don’t live in South Dakota, not everybody out there knows that. You know there’s a couple of yahoos in Minneapolis and there’s a guy out in Denver, there’s people from outside the walls of South Dakota who are perpetuating this hate campaign.
After Beck's venomous attack, he got
blog-swarmed.
Andrew Sullivan was taken aback by Beck's obtuseness. It even caught the attention of
Mark Steyn.
Elsewhere in Beck's column is this guffaw-inducing quote:
"This newspaper will be the singular source in the state for factual, unbiased news about the candidates and where they stand,'' said assistant managing editor Patrick Lalley, who coordinates our political coverage.
Earth to Patrick Lalley: nobody's buying it. Patrick Lalley, the guy Beck now says is "coordinating" the AL's political coverage, is the same guy who has in the past
offhandedly referred to Republicans as "evil." Gee, do you think that sentiment might shade the AL's coverage of the 2004 campaigns just a teensy bit? A reasonable person could believe that it's unlikely that Lalley can separate himself from his strongly held feelings as he makes split-second decisions in the day-to-day chaos of the newsroom.
One of the worst biases exhibited by the editors of the Argus Leader is the bias of omission. That is, there are many stories regarding South Dakota politics (usually stories negatively reflecting on Tom Daschle) that simply go unreported in the pages of the AL. (For a recent compelling example, click HERE.) It's not just about the fact that what makes it into the pages of the Argus Leader is often biased, it's the fact that there's so much that doesn't even make it into its pages.
Hopefully, the pattern of the Argus Leader's bias of omission will end after July 4, when Beck claims that the election season begins "in earnest." But if today's article by David Kranz, the dean of South Dakota political reporters, is any guide, don't hold your breath. Once again, Kranz omits negative news about Daschle and reports negative news about Thune. Daschle's negativity a little over a week ago in using the same tactics as Tom Delay goes unmentioned, while Thune's negativity gets a blaring headline.
Recent Comments